Some Perspective Please

Some Perspective Please
As a sociologist, my training is to make connections, and look beyond the present, beyond the individual, and beyond the “bits and pieces” offered by the media. With regard to the ongoing controversy surrounding the location of the Islamic Community Center in NYC, it is all too easy to get caught up in the details of recent events and lose perspective. Segregation, prejudice, fear, and misunderstanding brought about by religious diversity is as American as apple pie. So too is religious assimilation and genuine outreach and appreciation.
Recently, I read an editorial in a major newspaper in which the writer argued that in light of the mean-spiritedness triggered in part by the controversy over the Islamic community center, e pluribus unum (out of many one) is in danger of becoming e pluribus pluribus. In other words, unity is a thing of the past; divisiveness is the new norm. The writer, I think, could have used some perspective. Throughout American history, e pluribus unum has always been, in many respects, more theoretical than actual culture. Certainly, Mormons, Muslims, Quakers, Catholics, Jews, and other religious outsiders can attest to that. Because of prejudices in the larger society, people from these groups were at times considered not “American” enough. Furthermore, many so-called “True Americans” assumed these outsiders were hell bent on destroying our freedoms and our way of life.
While we can focus on individual Muslims to make any argument we want to make, we could do the same thing with any religious group, Christians included. The current controversy is simply the latest episode of religious intolerance and tolerance in American history. And, like other religious outsiders in the U.S., Muslims will be increasingly accepted and absorbed into mainstream American society in the years to come. But it won’t be easy, it never is.
What’s your perspective?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Could You Truly Value a “Temple Grandin?”

Imagine someone in your place of work who has a tendency to get on peoples’ nerves. She utters meaningless phrases at times, talks to herself, is socially distant , and finds it difficult to interact with other employees and clients. Frequently, she finds work too stressful and needs to go off by herself for a while; sometimes for hours at a time. When you ask her about it, she simply describes it as “relief therapy.”
But she is a brilliant, hard worker, who tends to think in pictures, and can recall details that everyone else seems to miss. That is, she perceives and remembers things visually. As she says, language is her second language. She comes up with provocative, ingenious ideas that enable you and your coworkers to problem-solve much more effectively.
Is this someone you would hire or even value at work? While her upside is significant, her lack of social skills is a concern as well. This person, by the way, comes to my mind because I just watched the movie, Temple Grandin.
Temple Grandin is an extremely bright person with autistim. She is a professor of Animal Science at Colorado State University. Because of her autism, she has skills that have allowed her to do some amazing things. And yet, she has been ostracized and subjected to ridicule and scorn because of her distinctive and unusual behaviors.
How would you relate to her? Are you able to value people like Temple? What about your coworkers? Your friends?
If you have time, spend a couple of hours watching a newly released DVD about this amazing lady. You will be glad you did.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

To All Whites, Dr. Laura Included, Don’t Use It Ever

I am a white college professor who teaches at a historically black, urban community college. A while back, I was discussing an excerpt from The Autobiography of Malcolm X. In the excerpt, Malcolm X discusses what it feels like to be treated as less than human, a “mascot.” He refers to the casual way in which white people call him by the N word. As I discussed this with my class, I actually said the word itself one or two times, in the context of this story.
Later that day, I got an email from one of my African American students in this class. He wanted to meet with me. He did not tell me why. When we met the next day, he mentioned he was surprised. He went on to say that he couldn’t believe that I was using the N word in class. I explained to him that I only used it in the context of the story.
What this experience taught me is that the N word is so powerful, so emotional, so volatile, that when it is used by a white person it can obliterate context. In other words, context does not matter. Dr. Laura Schlessinger, who repeatedly used the N word on her radio show earlier this week, acted surprised that a caller took her comments out of context. What she learned, is that there is no context in which white people should use it, at home, at work, or at play. If it is a concept that needs to be addressed, white people should say “the N word” (not the actual word).
Laura Schlessinger, someone who is highly educated and who has studied the human psyche and human relations, should know this. However, I am not going to do a number on Laura. We all make mistakes when it comes to hot buttons such as the N word. And whether African Americans should use this term is something we can discuss another day. If you are White, don’t use it. No ifs, ands, or buts. End of lesson.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What if Slater was…

Sometimes, the relevance of certain dimensions of diversity, such race, gender, marital status, and age can be overblown, largely invisible, or irrelevant.  Sometimes not.  Consider the popularity of Steven Slater, the fed-up JetBlue flight attendant who let his emotions get the better of him. After cursing a passenger, thanking well-behaved passengers, and grabbing a beer, he capped off his moment of fame by sliding down the plane’s emergency chute. Since that time, he has become a hero or at least cult-like figure to many who admire his chutzpah and perhaps, would secretly like to kiss their jobs good-bye as well.
What if Steven was a man of color or an English language learner? What if he was older or less cocky and self-assured? Would these differences affect public perception? Would the passenger s who snickered at his comments have been more concerned and fearful? If Steven was a young Black or Latino male, would public perception have been any different? What if we changed Steven’s gender and marital status? Let’s say he was a female, middle-aged single parent. Would public opinion shift? After all, who is going to take care of her children while she sorts out her life? What about an older male whose personal Web site mentions that he is bilingual and a Muslim? Would his message get drowned out by people’s hidden biases? And would fewer people identify with him?
I’d like to hear from you. Your thoughts?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

August 7, 2010

The Tea Party is racist. Arizona’s immigration law is racist. The NAACP is racist. Standardized tests, the criminal justice system, and song lyrics are racist. The list goes on and on. YouTube even has the “Top 10 TV Racist Comments.”

What is racism? Well, it depends who you ask. Many definitions point to feelings or beliefs that convey racial superiority. Some refer to racism as what we think (prejudice) while others view racism as what we do (discrimination). Racism ranges from overgeneralizations (racial stereotypes) to harassment to other forms of intolerance and aggressive behavior. Depending on who is doing the talking, it can be abusive or aggressive behavior by an individual, a group or organization, or even a society. Lastly, there are those who argue that only people with power can be racist. Given this line of reasoning, some maintain that only Whites can be racist while others say not so fast. They point to numerous situations in which blacks or other racial minorities have power. Pain is pain they argue; regardless of the race of the perpetrator or victim.

What are we to make of all this? When someone uses the word racism, do we know what definition s(he) has in mind? Has the word become so widely used that it is losing its punch? And is there one definition we can all agree on?

What do you think?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Welcome to my blog.

Welcome to my blog on diversity consciousness.  I look forward to hearing from you, and what we can share and take from this blog

Diversity includes a mind-boggling array of differences, including intellectual viewpoints, age, gender, orientation, race, ethnicity, religion, personality, learning style, music tastes, body adornment such as tattoos …the list goes on and on.  Unfortunately, many discussions on diversity don’t take all of this into account.

Diversity by itself can be an accident waiting to happen or a benefit waiting to be developed.  Diversity plus diversity consciousness is an absolute necessity.  Without the necessary awareness, knowledge, and skills, the potential of diversity will remain untapped and may even produce disastrous results.

Even though it is not easy, let us try to be open, honest, and respectful as we discuss diversity and diversity consciousness.  It requires a strong commitment to share, truly listen, and realize that we are all works in progress.

Each week, I will be posting on my blog, commenting on a current, newsworthy event.  I truly hope you will join me.  Thanks,

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment